Category: Investments

Author: Tim Courtney

Market Volatility Update March 12, 2020

Date: 03/13/20

March 2020

 

Obviously, as everyone knows, this has been a very volatile week. I am trying to think of another time where we have seen markets this volatile. The closest one that comes to mind is the fourth quarter of 2008, but even this eclipses it. This is unique in that the market is trying to wrap its arms around an issue that we really have not had to deal with which is, 'exactly how much is this virus going to cost, not only in human lives, but in economic damage?'


I think the market over the last couple of weeks has been assuming that much of the American economy would go on as normal, but that there would be some changes.   We knew some events would be canceled and that other travel plans would be canceled and re-booked for later. But, I think the market largely thought our daily lives probably wouldn't change a whole lot. Last night, that really changed. Psychologically, it changed. So many organizations and entities canceled their events for the foreseeable future.


One thing that is different about this decline from the previous two declines that we have seen in the market, which were in 2000 and 2008, those two declines were caused largely by market miss-allocations of capital. In 2000, there was a lot of money chasing the 'dot coms' in the famous tech bubble. The market began to fall because of that miss-allocation of capital and a recession ensued because of the market decline.


That same thing happened in 2008, we had excessive leverage working its way through the financial system within banks and investment balance sheets. Once that leverage began to unwind, it caused the market to correct in a major way--falling 50% from the top [S&P 500 returns]. The decline then caused a recession in the economy.


This time, we don't have the same kind of miss-allocations of capital where the market is causing the issue. This is truly a recession and implies that corporate earnings will fall. But the positive thing about this decline, is that we can estimate what those numbers should be.


The reason the market is this volatile is because we don't know how long this is going to last and we don't know how much the bottom lines are going to be affected but we can make some assumptions and determine maybe how far the market could fall beyond what it already has. This will likely be a temporary fall and not a permanently lower earnings number. It is not as though all future earnings at US companies should be discounted at a 25% rate today. As in previous health crises that we have seen, the market has corrected, there has been some amount of economic loss that occurs from that but there is a recovery and this is something that we expect.


As with other health crises, we will get through this. There will be a time where there is a recovery of both the economy and the earnings. So, logically the earnings should not be discounted permanently because of this.


A common question that comes about in times like this is 'should we sell to avoid potential further losses?' In times like this no one is sure of where the bottom might be.   If you could save and potentially avoid additional losses, that seems like a valid strategy--to sell now and then by back at a later time when things look more attractive or they look more stable.


When others have looked at this and us as well, the window you have to time this correctly is fairly small. We are down about 25% [S&P 500 returns] in three weeks. It is not inconceivable that in a month or so when the market starts to feel better about things or whenever that might be, you might have a very small window of time from that market bottom to get back into stocks before they recover. It is this timing that is so difficult, and based on our numbers, we think an investor has to buy back into the market within 10 business days of the market bottom. This is a timing window that is too tight for most people to be able to hit and to be able to do consistently.


So, I think in times like this, the best advice is to review your asset allocation and make sure that it makes sense with your overall planning. We live on cashflows and those cashflows come from our investments. We have a certain timeframe and a certain amount of cashflows that we need to fund our standard of living. If that hasn't changed, if those fundamentals of your personal planning haven't changed, it is likely that no changes need to be made to the asset allocation.


We don't want to rush in and sell assets that we believe are trading at $0.70 on the dollar today. If you are nearing retirement and you have planned the next 5-10 years of your life out and you know roughly how much you need and when, then there shouldn't be any need to change your asset allocation. If something has changed with your estimates in terms of what you need, then that could justify a change. If you feel there are changes to your own circumstance, please talk with one of our wealth advisor's today about it.


PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT AN INDICATION OF FUTURE RETURNS. Information and opinions provided herein reflect the views of the author as of the publication date of this article. Such views and opinions are subject to change at any point and without notice. Some of the information provided herein was obtained from third-party sources believed to be reliable but such information is not guaranteed to be accurate. In addition, the links provided within are for convenience only and the provision of the links does not imply any sponsorship, endorsement, or approval of any of the content. We do not guarantee the content or its accuracy and completeness. The content is being provided for informational purposes only, and nothing within is, or is intended to constitute, investment, tax, or legal advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any types of securities or investments. The author has not taken into account the investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any individual investor. Any forward-looking statements or forecasts are based on assumptions only, and actual results are expected to vary from any such statements or forecasts. No reliance should be placed on any such statements or forecasts when making any investment decision. Any assumptions and projections displayed are estimates, hypothetical in nature, and meant to serve solely as a guideline. No investment decision should be made based solely on any information provided herein and the author is not responsible for the consequences of any decisions or actions taken as a result of information provided in this book. There is a risk of loss from an investment in securities, including the risk of total loss of principal, which an investor will need to be prepared to bear. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be profitable or suitable for a particular investor’s financial situation or risk tolerance. Exencial Wealth Advisors, LLC (“EWA”) is an investment adviser registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). However, such registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training and no inference to the contrary should be made. EWA may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, notice filed, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration or notice filing requirements. Complete information about our services and fees is contained in our Form ADV Part 2A (Disclosure Brochure), a copy of which can be obtained at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or by calling us at 888-478-1971 

About the author

4054781971

tcourtney@exencialwealth.com

Oklahoma City, Ok

Chief Investment Officer

Tim Courtney serves as Chief Investment Officer of Exencial Wealth Advisors and chairs the investment committee. He attained the Certified Investment Management Analyst (CIMA) designation in 2005 a... CLICK HERE TO READ MORE